School-Related Stress & Early Psychological Assessment: Clinical Insights with Implications for Metabolic Vulnerability
- Oct 19, 2024
- 7 min read
Introduction
Prediabetes is increasingly recognized as a health concern not only among middle-aged and older adults, but also among adolescents and young adults. A nationally representative study estimated that approximately one in five adolescents and one in four young adults in the United States have prediabetes [1]. Because prediabetes often develops without obvious symptoms, identifying early indicators of increased metabolic vulnerability is important for early prevention.
Growing evidence indicates that psychological symptoms, particularly anxiety and depression, are common among individuals with prediabetes [2–4]. At the same time, students are exposed to sustained academic demands, uncertainty about the future, family expectations, and other psychosocial stressors. Large-scale epidemiological studies have documented a substantial burden of mental disorders among children and adolescents, while systematic reviews have consistently reported high levels of stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms among college students [5–7]. Collectively, these findings suggest that school-related psychological stress warrants greater attention as a potential upstream factor contributing to early metabolic vulnerability in young populations.
Drawing on illustrative clinical observations from a psycho-cardiology clinic and supported by existing literature, this article discusses the clinical manifestations of school-related stress in students and highlights the potential value of standardized psychological assessment for early identification and monitoring. It further considers how early recognition of stress-related psychological and somatic symptoms may facilitate timely psychological support and lifestyle-based interventions, thereby contributing to strategies aimed at reducing future metabolic vulnerability.
I. Psycho-Cardiology Practice and Psychological Assessment
The clinical observations presented in this article were obtained during clinical training at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, under the supervision of Dr. Jialiang Mao. During this period, I was introduced to the interdisciplinary field of psycho-cardiology, which integrates cardiovascular medicine with psychological assessment and emphasizes the interaction between emotional states and physical health.
A standardized psychological assessment protocol was routinely applied, including:
• Self-rating Somatic Symptoms Scale China (SSS-CN) (Figure1) [8] was developed with reference to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for somatic symptom disorder (SSD). It is a practical screening instrument that simultaneously assesses somatic symptoms, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, and is designed to evaluate the presence and severity of somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptoms [8–10].
SSS-CN Score Interpretation
Normal: <20-29
Mild: 30–39
Moderate: 40–59
Severe: ≥ 60
Figure 1. The Somatic Symptom Scale-China
• Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), used to assess depressive symptoms [9,11].
PHQ-9 Score Interpretation
Minimal depression: 0–4
Mild depression: 5–9
Moderate depression: 10–14
Moderately severe depression: 15–19
Severe depression: ≥ 20
• Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), used to assess anxiety symptoms [9,12].
GAD-7 Score Interpretation
Minimal anxiety: 0–4
Mild anxiety: 5–9
Moderate anxiety: 10–14
Severe anxiety: ≥ 15
These validated assessment tools enable systematic and quantitative assessment of both psychological and somatic symptoms in non-psychiatric clinical settings. They facilitate longitudinal monitoring of symptom changes and provide an objective basis for clinical evaluation, individualized treatment planning, and follow-up. In clinical practice, these assessment findings can help guide appropriate interventions, including pharmacological treatment, psychological counseling, or combined approaches, according to each patient's clinical needs.
II. Clinical Observations in Students
In the psycho-cardiology outpatient clinic, students across different educational stages presented with stress-related psychological and somatic symptoms. Although metabolic parameters were not routinely collected in this clinical setting, standardized psychological assessments revealed consistent and measurable symptom patterns across cases.
Case 1 – Elementary School Student (Age 8)
Chief complaints: dizziness, loss of smell
Duration: 6 months (absence from school)
Medical evaluation: no identifiable organic abnormalities
Assessment scores:
SSS-CN: 30 (mild)
PHQ-9: within the normal range
GAD-7: within the normal range
Interpretation:
This case may represent an early presentation of stress-related somatic symptoms in the absence of identifiable organic abnormalities. Although standardized assessments did not indicate clinically significant anxiety or depressive symptoms, the persistence of symptoms and their impact on school attendance and daily functioning suggested the need for early psychological support. Accordingly, family-based psychotherapy was recommended.
Case 2 – High School Student
Background: significant academic pressure
Initial presentation: fatigue, anxiety, reduced concentration
Baseline scores:
SSS-CN: 50 (moderate)
PHQ-9: 15 (moderately severe)
GAD-7: 11 (moderate)
Follow-up (after initiation of pharmacological treatment):
SSS-CN: 35 (mild)
PHQ-9: 5 (mild)
GAD-7: 6 (mild)
Interpretation:
This case demonstrates measurable improvement in both somatic and psychological symptoms following treatment. During the early phase of management, the patient received pharmacological therapy with follow-up visits at approximately two-week intervals. The patient has continued treatment thereafter.
Case 3 – College Student (Sophomore)
Presentation:
The patient presented with fatigue, reduced motivation, and expressed persistent feelings of hopelessness, stating that life lacked meaning.
Assessment scores:
SSS-CN: 45 (moderate)
PHQ-9: 21 (severe depression)
GAD-7: 6 (mild anxiety)
Management:
The patient is currently undergoing active treatment, including both pharmacological therapy and psychological counseling.
Interpretation:
This case is characterized by the coexistence of severe depressive symptoms and moderate somatic symptom burden, accompanied by significant subjective distress, supporting integrated clinical management.
Cross-Case Patterns
Across the three cases, several consistent features were observed:
Quantifiable psychological and somatic symptom profiles assessed using the SSS-CN, PHQ-9, and GAD-7
Physical symptoms in the absence of identifiable organic pathology, with SSS-CN scores suggestive of mild-to-moderate somatic symptom disorder (SSD)
Potential involvement of psychosocial stressors
Functional impairment affecting school participation or daily functioning
Symptom improvement following clinical management
Although based on a limited number of illustrative cases, these observations demonstrate the practical value of standardized psychological assessment in identifying, characterizing, and monitoring stress-related symptom patterns across different educational stages.
III.Potential Biological Pathways from School-Related Stress to Early Metabolic Vulnerability
Psychological stress may influence metabolic health through multiple interconnected biological and behavioral pathways. Chronic stress activates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to sustained elevation of cortisol levels, which can promote gluconeogenesis, impair insulin sensitivity, and contribute to visceral fat accumulation [13,14]. In parallel, activation of the sympathetic nervous system increases catecholamine release, further elevating blood glucose levels and altering energy metabolism. Chronic psychological stress has been linked to activation of inflammatory responses, while low-grade systemic inflammation, characterized by increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, is known to contribute to the development of insulin resistance and metabolic dysregulation [15,16].
Beyond these biological mechanisms, stress also affects everyday behaviors, including sleep, diet, and physical activity, which may further exacerbate metabolic dysregulation. As metabolic dysregulation progresses, it may also influence brain function, particularly in regions involved in emotional regulation—including the prefrontal cortex, limbic structures (such as the amygdala and hippocampus), and the hypothalamus—thereby further affecting emotional and behavioral responses [17,18].
These interconnected processes may create a self-reinforcing cycle in which psychological stress, physiological responses, behavioral dysregulation, and physical symptoms interact dynamically, potentially increasing vulnerability to metabolic dysregulation and related disorders.
Figure 2 summarizes the proposed pathway from school-related stress to metabolic vulnerability, integrating psychophysiological dysregulation, physiological changes, and opportunities for early intervention.
IV. Implications for Early Prevention in Young Populations
Accumulating evidence suggests that chronic psychological stress may contribute to metabolic dysregulation through interconnected biological and behavioral pathways. Students experiencing sustained school-related stress may therefore represent a population with increased metabolic vulnerability, in addition to an elevated risk of psychological disorders. Although not all individuals exposed to chronic stress will develop prediabetes or other metabolic disorders, early recognition of psychological symptoms and stress-related somatic symptoms may create opportunities for timely psychological support and lifestyle-based preventive interventions.
V. Conclusion
Observations from psycho-cardiology practice illustrate the complex interplay between stress, psychological symptoms, and physical health in young populations.
This article brings together current evidence and clinical observations to explore the relationship between school-related psychological stress and early metabolic vulnerability. Although direct metabolic measurements were not available in the presented cases, the observations revealed measurable psychological and somatic manifestations associated with stress. These findings may represent early clinical features along the proposed pathway summarized in Figure 2.
These observations also underscore the value of standardized psychological assessment in students experiencing sustained school-related stress. Such assessment may facilitate the early identification of psychological distress and functional impairment, creating opportunities for timely psychological support and lifestyle-based interventions before more serious psychological or metabolic consequences develop.
Further research incorporating metabolic biomarkers is needed to clarify these relationships and to define the role of psychological assessment in the early prevention of metabolic disorders.
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Jialiang Mao and the clinical team at Renji Hospital for their valuable guidance and support.
References
1. Linda J. Andes, Yiling J. Cheng, Deborah B. Rolka, et al. Prevalence of Prediabetes Among
Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States, 2005–2016. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(2): e194498. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4498
2. Zhixiong CHEN , Ailin ZENG, Yaqin HU, et al. The incidence and influential factors of anxiety in pre- diabetic patients[J]. Chinese General Practice,2019,22(20):2411-2415. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007- 9572.2019.00.030
3. Ulaş Serkan Topaloğlu, Kemal Erol. Fatigue, anxiety and depression in patients with prediabetes:a
controlled cross‑sectional study. Diabetology International (2022) 13:631–636
4. Montaha Mahmoud , Razi Mahmood. Differences in mental health status between individuals living with diabetes, and pre-diabetes in Qatar: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon. 2024;10(1):e23515.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23515
5. Christian Kieling,Claudia Buchweitz, Arthur Caye, et al. Worldwide prevalence and disability from mental disorders across childhood and adolescence: evidence from the global burden of disease study.
JAMA Psychiatry. (2024) 81:347–56. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5051
6. Sharmistha Roy, Ashis Kumar Biswas, Manoj Sharma. Stress, Anxiety, and Depression as Psychological Distress Among College and Undergraduate Students: A Scoping Review of Reviews Guided by the Socio-Ecological Modell. Healthcare (Basel). 2025;13(16):1948. doi:10.3390/healthcare13161948
7. Randy P Auerbach, Philippe Mortier, Ronny Bruffaerts, et al. WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018;127(7):623–638. doi: 10.1037/abn0000362
8. Meng Jiang, Weituo Zhang, Xuan Su, et al. Identifying and measuring the severity of somatic symptom disorder using the Self-reported Somatic Symptom Scale-China (SSS-CN): a research protocol for a diagnostic study. BMJ. 2019 Sep 26;9(9): e024290. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018- 024290
9. Yani Wu, Zhengyu Tao, Yongxia Qiao, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of somatic symptom
disorder in the elderly in a community-based population: a large-scale cross-sectional study in China. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 12;22:257. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03907-1
10. Qi Z, Jialiang M, Chunbo L, et al. Developing of somatic self-rating scale and its reliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science 2010;19:847-9. [Google Scholar]
11. Kurt Kroenke, Robert L Spitzer, Janet B W Williams. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525- 1497.2001.016009606.x.
12. Robert L Spitzer, Kurt Kroenke, Janet B W Williams, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
13. Ruth A Hackett, Andrew Steptoe. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and psychological stress-a modifiable risk factor. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2017 Sep;13(9):547-560. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.64
14. Joshua J Joseph, Sherita H Golden. Cortisol dysregulation: the bidirectional link between stress, depression, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Mar;1391(1):20-34. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13217
15. Paul H Black. The inflammatory response is an integral part of the stress response: Implications for atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, type II diabetes and metabolic syndrome X. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2003 Oct;17(5):350-64. doi: 10.1016/s0889-1591(03)00048-5.
16. Gökhan S Hotamisligil. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. 2006;444(7121):860–867. doi: 10.1038/nature05485
17. Stephanie Kullmann, Martin Heni, Manfred Hallschmid,, et al. Brain insulin resistance at the crossroads of metabolic and cognitive disorders. Physiol Rev.2016 Oct;96(4):1169-209.doi: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2015
18. Kevin N Ochsner, Jennifer A Silvers, Jason T Buhle. Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2012 Mar:1251:E1-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749- 6632.2012.06751.x.
Comments